RedLawList

Straightforward, actionable information for life’s common legal matters

Find an attorney at REDLAWLIST.ORG

Online Directory of Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury,
Consumer Protection and Criminal Defense Attorneys

  • Home
  • Knowledge Center
Home / Defective Products / Ford Lawsuit with State Attorney Generals in the Supreme Court

Ford Lawsuit with State Attorney Generals in the Supreme Court

December 18, 2020 By RedLawList Editor

Ford lawsuit in Supreme Court

A Ford lawsuit that is appealing state Supreme Court decisions in Minnesota and Montana was argued in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in October. The case is a high-profile showdown between the automotive giant and no fewer than 40 state attorney generals, and will have significant ripple effects on issues pertaining to consumer rights, the Internet economy and the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The backdrop is this:

In 1994, Minnesota resident Adam Bandemer was injured because the airbag in his Ford Crown Victoria was defective. The vehicle had been designed and manufactured in neighboring North Dakota and Ford therefore argued that Minnesota courts lacked jurisdiction. The state Supreme Court disagreed.

A similar case happened in Montana 2 years later, when a woman died because of a tread/belt separation on the highway. In this case, the car had been designed and manufactured in Washington state. Ford argued Montana courts lacked jurisdiction. The state Supreme Court disagreed.

With both cases involving the same legal principles, the United States Supreme Court took Ford’s appeals of both verdicts and combined them into a single case.

Ford’s legal team has taken the position that the 14th Amendment’s protection of due process means that defendants have to be sued where they live, do business or have sufficient contact. The purpose for this is to prevent a plaintiff from looking all over the country for a favorable judge.

The position of Montana and Minnesota, along with the state AGs who support them, is that Ford does extensive advertising in the states where the injured consumers bought the cars. They further point out that Ford sponsors events in these states and uses service data from dealerships in those states.

On the surface, Ford’s position would appear to be untenable. Injured victims have been able to bring legal action in the state where they were injured, so long as the manufacturer did business in those states. The state AGs point out that if Ford prevails, future plaintiffs would be required to do extensive travel to file lawsuits. This would be a difficult burden in any instance and nearly impossible in instances where a vehicle was manufactured abroad.

Court-watchers who observed the proceedings noted that the questions coming from Justices Clarence Thomas and Elena Kagan—considered to be philosophical opposites in legal matters—both seemed skeptical of Ford’s position on the grounds above.

But on the flip side, Chief Justice John Roberts questioned AGs from another angle. While this particular case might seem easy because of Ford’s resources, what about a small merchant who makes products and sells them on the Internet?

Are mom-and-pop shops like this going to be subject to civil lawsuits across the country?

Unlike Ford, this individual wouldn’t have the resources to handle a legal defense.

How the justices resolve these competing claims and what criteria they used to do so are going to set an important precedent. It’s worth noting though, that simple math works against Ford right now.

Only 8 justices were seated at the time of the hearing, which fell in the interim period between the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett. If the Court deadlocks at 4-4, the lower court decision stands—the ones that went against Ford.

Related resources

  • What Are the Different Types of Internet Child Sex Crimes in Texas?
    What Are the Different Types of Internet Child Sex Crimes in…
  • What Does Snapchat Liability Case Mean for Section 230?
    What Does Snapchat Liability Case Mean for Section 230?
  • Common Personal Injury Lawsuit Mistakes—And How to Avoid Them
    Common Personal Injury Lawsuit Mistakes—And How to Avoid…

Filed Under: Defective Products Tagged With: liability

Legal Topics

  • Accidents & Injuries
  • Criminal Law
  • Defective Products
  • Insurance Disputes
  • Legal News
  • Workers' Compensation

Must Reads

  • Understanding the Alternatives to Foreclosure
  • What Can I Expect at a Mediation Session?
  • Why Having a Business Succession Plan is Important
  • 5 Legal Concerns for Owners of Waterfront Property

Blogroll

  • Attorney Web Marketing
  • The Babcock Law Firm
  • Lawteryx: The Legal T-Rex
  • Sid Gilreath Law Firm
  • Workers' Comp Lawyers: Gerber & Holder
  • American Bar Association
  • Cornell Legal Encyclopedia
  • The Crime Report
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Volokn Conspiracy
  • Wall Street Journal Law Blog

Legal Directories

  • Enjuris: Directory for Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Martindale
  • RedLawList.org
  • Nolo
  • Find Law
  • Cornell Lawyer Directory

RSS Enjuris Law Blog

  • Top 5 Largest Dog Bite Verdicts and Settlements
  • What Is a Contingency Fee?
  • What Are the Potential Outcomes of a Personal Injury Lawsuit?
  • From Happy Meal to Heated Lawsuit: The McDonald's McNugget Case
  • Attorney Mike Redondo Discusses Liability in Florida Amusement Park Death

RSS Legal Week

  • New Colorado Law Extends Workers’ Comp Reporting Time July 27, 2022
  • Stephanie Tucker Receives WILG’s 2021 Rising Star Award November 13, 2021
  • Mack Babcock Swears In As President of WILG, A National Non-Profit for Injured Workers November 13, 2021
  • Differences in Workers’ Compensation Law July 27, 2021
  • Wall Street Journal Interviews Mack Babcock About COVID-19 Workers’ Comp Claims Denials April 9, 2021

RSS Lowering the Bar

  • Good Reason to Kill #78: Ate the Last Hot Pocket May 30, 2023
  • Bouncy-Castle King Gets 11 Years for Bouncy-Castle Arson May 22, 2023
  • Can You Claim a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy as a Guest If You Killed Your Hosts? May 12, 2023
  • Assorted Stupidity #155 April 28, 2023
  • Piano Man Convicted of Driving Piano While Under the Influence April 24, 2023

© 2023 RedLawList. All rights reserved.