RedLawList

Straightforward, actionable information for life’s common legal matters

Find an attorney at REDLAWLIST.ORG

Online Directory of Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury,
Consumer Protection and Criminal Defense Attorneys

  • Home
  • Knowledge Center
Home / Defective Products / Types of Manufacturing Defects: What They Are & How to Prove It

Types of Manufacturing Defects: What They Are & How to Prove It

July 17, 2020 By RedLawList Editor

types of manufacturing defects

There are 3 different ways a product can be defective that opens the door for a consumer lawsuit. A manufacturing defect happens when a product is unsafe due to the manner in which it was constructed. This particular defect must be differentiated from design defects, which point to problems prior to manufacturing ever starting.

Marketing defects pertain to misleading advertising or inadequate warning labels. Let’s take a look at the types of manufacturing defects, who’s liable and how any lawsuit is likely to play out in court.

Types of manufacturing defects

A manufacturing defect can happen if the wrong type of parts (e.g. screws, bolts) are used in putting a product together. Another example might be if the colors are chosen for safety reasons (red to indicate unsafe) and the wrong color is painted on.

A product could be trimmed incorrectly and potentially leave a jagged edge. The chain on a swing set might be loose or a car airbag may lack the capacity to deploy on impact. Any of these, and a lot more, are examples of a manufacturing defect.

Causes of defects

The root cause of the defect falls into 2 general categories. One is that the materials themselves were substandard, which falls on the manufacturing company themselves. The other is negligence—such as an employee neglecting proper procedure in putting the product together. This would be the fault of the employee.

However, it’s important to know that from the perspective of the injured party, it makes no difference whether the company or the employee is ultimately responsible. In a court of law, the company is on the hook.

This is the legal doctrine of strict liability which applies in product cases such as these. The reason for the defect is irrelevant to the courts. It matters only that the plaintiff can prove that the product was defective and was the cause of injury.

Defense strategies

A company faced with a product liability lawsuit can defend themselves by arguing either modification or assumption of risk. In the former case, the company would seek to establish that the customer changed the product in some way after purchase. The other option is to make the case that whatever activity caused the injury is something that was inherently risky in of itself.

In either case, the defense essentially boils down to arguing that although the defect might have existed, it was not the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries.

Winning won’t be easy

Even if you didn’t alter the product or engage in any obviously risky behavior, proving a manufacturing defect is not easy. The accident that caused your injuries may have rendered the product unrecognizable. Obtaining evidence about a company’s manufacturing process is far from easy and it requires a knowledgeable attorney who knows where to begin.

Related resources

  • What Does Snapchat Liability Case Mean for Section 230?
    What Does Snapchat Liability Case Mean for Section 230?
  • What is Evidence? An Introduction to Federal Rules
    What is Evidence? An Introduction to Federal Rules
  • An Overview of the Goldman Sachs Settlement in Malaysia
    An Overview of the Goldman Sachs Settlement in Malaysia

Filed Under: Defective Products Tagged With: unsafe products

Legal Topics

  • Accidents & Injuries
  • Criminal Law
  • Defective Products
  • Insurance Disputes
  • Legal News
  • Workers' Compensation

Must Reads

  • Understanding the Alternatives to Foreclosure
  • What Can I Expect at a Mediation Session?
  • Why Having a Business Succession Plan is Important
  • 5 Legal Concerns for Owners of Waterfront Property

Blogroll

  • Attorney Web Marketing
  • The Babcock Law Firm
  • Lawteryx: The Legal T-Rex
  • Sid Gilreath Law Firm
  • Workers' Comp Lawyers: Gerber & Holder
  • American Bar Association
  • Cornell Legal Encyclopedia
  • The Crime Report
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Volokn Conspiracy
  • Wall Street Journal Law Blog

Legal Directories

  • Enjuris: Directory for Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Martindale
  • RedLawList.org
  • Nolo
  • Find Law
  • Cornell Lawyer Directory

RSS Enjuris Law Blog

  • Top 5 Largest Dog Bite Verdicts and Settlements
  • What Is a Contingency Fee?
  • What Are the Potential Outcomes of a Personal Injury Lawsuit?
  • From Happy Meal to Heated Lawsuit: The McDonald's McNugget Case
  • Attorney Mike Redondo Discusses Liability in Florida Amusement Park Death

RSS Legal Week

  • New Colorado Law Extends Workers’ Comp Reporting Time July 27, 2022
  • Stephanie Tucker Receives WILG’s 2021 Rising Star Award November 13, 2021
  • Mack Babcock Swears In As President of WILG, A National Non-Profit for Injured Workers November 13, 2021
  • Differences in Workers’ Compensation Law July 27, 2021
  • Wall Street Journal Interviews Mack Babcock About COVID-19 Workers’ Comp Claims Denials April 9, 2021

RSS Lowering the Bar

  • Good Reason to Kill #78: Ate the Last Hot Pocket May 30, 2023
  • Bouncy-Castle King Gets 11 Years for Bouncy-Castle Arson May 22, 2023
  • Can You Claim a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy as a Guest If You Killed Your Hosts? May 12, 2023
  • Assorted Stupidity #155 April 28, 2023
  • Piano Man Convicted of Driving Piano While Under the Influence April 24, 2023

© 2023 RedLawList. All rights reserved.