RedLawList

Straightforward, actionable information for life’s common legal matters

Find an attorney at REDLAWLIST.ORG

Online Directory of Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury,
Consumer Protection and Criminal Defense Attorneys

  • Home
  • Knowledge Center
Home / Legal News / Louisiana Law Raises Bar for COVID-19 Lawsuits Against Schools

Louisiana Law Raises Bar for COVID-19 Lawsuits Against Schools

August 29, 2020 By RLL editor

ppp loan funds

As a nation looks for a way to reopen its schools and economy safely, liability issues loom large for decision-makers. No one wants to get sued if someone contracts the coronavirus on their property. The state of Louisiana responded to these concerns by enacting a law that makes it difficult to win COVID-19 lawsuits against schools.

The Bayou State has already acted to provide legal protection to government agencies, private businesses, trade shows and events. The same principles were applied to the laws meant to protect school systems—both public and private—all the way from kindergarten through college.

Proving negligence is the standard legal bar that a plaintiff must clear when filing a lawsuit against these institutions. The new law raised that bar by requiring the negligence be “grossly negligent or wanton misconduct.”

The difference is this: in a standard negligence case, the plaintiff would only need to establish that decision makers at an institution acted without taking the precautions that would normally be taken by “a reasonable and prudent person.”

Under the new and higher standard, the negligence must be so severe as to be willful or in some way intolerable beyond the pale.

An example in the field of medicine would be that a surgeon making a poor decision on where to operate would not be enough to establish negligence. The doctor might have to do something over the top, like leave their medical equipment inside the patient’s body.

The late Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once memorably defined it as the difference between stumbling over a dog or kicking it.

Both sides of the debate believe they had the best interests of the students of heart. Rep. Buddy Mincey, who sponsored the bill, said, “if we don’t provide reasonable liability protections for our schools…they’re going to say ‘I’ll see you online.’”

The other side found their voice in Rep. Gary Carter, who said, “I’m just in favor of erring on the side of fighting for our children. I think this legislation reduces the protection of our children for the benefit of our schools.”

The debate illustrates the fears and resulting passions that are behind this conversation in all sectors of society.

On the one hand, there is a real fear that students and at-risk teachers may contract COVID-19 if they return to school, an environment where social distancing and enforcement of masks can be challenging.

On the other hand, there is a fear that restricting classes to online will highlight economic divisions in society—parents who can either work from home and give their kids access to Wi-Fi will have a distinct advantage over those who cannot.

Where the middle point between these concerns is continues to be studied. The results in Louisiana will surely be observed across the nation.

Related resources

  • What’s At Stake in the Los Angeles School Closures Lawsuit
    What’s At Stake in the Los Angeles School Closures Lawsuit
  • Bayer Roundup Lawsuit Remains Unsettled Amidst COVID-19 Shutdown
    Bayer Roundup Lawsuit Remains Unsettled Amidst COVID-19…
  • Ford Lawsuit with State Attorney Generals in the Supreme Court
    Ford Lawsuit with State Attorney Generals in the Supreme…

Filed Under: Legal News Tagged With: covid-19, students

Legal Topics

  • Accidents & Injuries
  • Criminal Law
  • Defective Products
  • Insurance Disputes
  • Legal News
  • Workers' Compensation

Must Reads

  • Understanding the Alternatives to Foreclosure
  • What Can I Expect at a Mediation Session?
  • Why Having a Business Succession Plan is Important
  • 5 Legal Concerns for Owners of Waterfront Property

Blogroll

  • Attorney Web Marketing
  • The Babcock Law Firm
  • Lawteryx: The Legal T-Rex
  • Sid Gilreath Law Firm
  • Workers' Comp Lawyers: Gerber & Holder
  • American Bar Association
  • Cornell Legal Encyclopedia
  • The Crime Report
  • SCOTUS Blog
  • Volokn Conspiracy
  • Wall Street Journal Law Blog

Legal Directories

  • Enjuris: Directory for Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Martindale
  • RedLawList.org
  • Nolo
  • Find Law
  • Cornell Lawyer Directory

RSS Enjuris Law Blog

  • Amazon Can't Escape Suicide-kit Lawsuit
  • Enjuris Interview: Meet South Carolina Workers’ Compensation and Personal Injury Lawyer George Taylor
  • Can Text Messages Be Used in Court?
  • Trader Joe’s Sued Over Chocolate with Alleged Unsafe Levels of Lead and Cadmium
  • Indiana Driver Avoids Jail Time as Judge Accepts Plea Agreement

RSS Legal Week

  • New Colorado Law Extends Workers’ Comp Reporting Time July 27, 2022
  • Stephanie Tucker Receives WILG’s 2021 Rising Star Award November 13, 2021
  • Mack Babcock Swears In As President of WILG, A National Non-Profit for Injured Workers November 13, 2021
  • Differences in Workers’ Compensation Law July 27, 2021
  • Wall Street Journal Interviews Mack Babcock About COVID-19 Workers’ Comp Claims Denials April 9, 2021

RSS Lowering the Bar

  • Judge: F-Word No Longer Has Sufficient “Shock Value” to Be a Problem at Work February 1, 2023
  • Canadian Democracy Survives Cinnamon-Bun Scandal January 26, 2023
  • UPDATE: Auto Insurer May Not Have to Pay for Back-Seat Transmission January 17, 2023
  • Congratulations on Not Catching Jack the Ripper January 6, 2023
  • Surveillance-Camera Thief Captures Complete Record of His Crime December 16, 2022

© 2023 RedLawList. All rights reserved.